BeanHawk vs A2X
A2X is settlement-level accounting software that posts summarized Amazon/Shopify payouts to QuickBooks and Xero. It's the established premium option for marketplace bookkeeping.
BeanHawk is accounting software for Amazon and multichannel sellers that also recovers the money Amazon owes you: settlement journals, inventory economics, and FBA reimbursement recovery in one flat-priced plan.
| Capability | BeanHawk | A2X |
|---|---|---|
| FBA reimbursement recovery | ✓Core wedge, continuous FBA discrepancy detection and claim filing. | ✗No FBA reimbursement recovery. |
| Settlement → QuickBooks & Xero journals | ✓One summarized journal per settlement, reconciled to the penny. | ✓Strong, accountant-trusted settlement accounting. |
| Per-SKU COGS & inventory valuation | ✓Perpetual SKU valuation and COGS from real landed cost. | ~COGS available, often on higher tiers; limited inventory valuation. |
| Landed cost & purchase orders | ✓Landed-cost POs feed COGS and reimbursement valuation. | ✗No landed-cost purchase-order workflow. |
| Multichannel (Amazon, eBay, Shopify, Walmart, Etsy) | ✓Every channel supported. | ✓Major channels supported, but priced per channel. |
| Flat pricing, every channel included | ✓One flat price, no per-channel fees. | ✗Priced per channel and by order volume. |
| Free fee calculators & reimbursement audit | ✓Free FBA/eBay/Shopify calculators and a free reimbursement audit. | ~Educational resources; no free reimbursement audit. |
| Pricing | Flat, all channels included, from $19/mo. | Premium; tiers scale with order volume and are charged per sales channel. Verify current pricing. |
Comparison reflects each product's positioning as of 2026; competitor features and pricing change, so verify current details on their site.
Choose A2X if
Sellers (or their accountants) who want best-in-class settlement bookkeeping and don't need reimbursement recovery or inventory in the same tool.
Choose BeanHawk if
BeanHawk matches A2X-grade settlement journals, then adds FBA reimbursement recovery and inventory valuation, at one flat price instead of per-channel tiers.
What A2X genuinely does well
A2X has been doing settlement accounting longer than almost anyone, and it shows in the parts that only matter at year end. A payout gets split into sales, refunds, shipping income, gift-card liability, marketplace-facilitator tax already withheld, and each fee type, and the resulting journal ties back to the exact deposit that hit your bank. Accountants trust it because the reconciliation is boring, and boring is what you want from a ledger.
The accountant network matters as much as the software. Hand your books to a firm that does ecommerce work and there's a good chance they have already closed dozens of sets on A2X and know which accounts they want each component mapped to. That familiarity cuts real hours out of a close, and it is a legitimate reason to pick a tool.
It also handles the awkward cases properly. Multi-currency payouts, VAT treatment, and settlements that straddle a month boundary get accrued into the period they belong to rather than dumped into whichever month the cash happened to land. Sellers rarely notice that work until an accountant points out how much cleanup it prevented.
How the pricing model works, and where it bites
A2X charges per sales channel, with tiers that step up as order volume grows. Check their site for the current numbers because they change, but the shape has stayed consistent: every marketplace you connect is effectively its own subscription, and growth moves each one up a tier.
For one Amazon account that is simple and often perfectly reasonable. Sell on Amazon US, Amazon UK, Shopify and eBay and you are paying four times, with four separate volume curves. Sellers who expand channels are the ones who feel this first, usually in the same quarter they add the channel.
There is nothing dishonest about the model. Each connector is real engineering and real maintenance, so charging per connector is defensible. It just means your back-office bill grows on the same curve as your revenue, which is the opposite of what most operators want from accounting software.
What A2X does not do
A2X does not file FBA reimbursement claims. It is accounting software, so it treats a lost-inventory adjustment as a line to post, not a discrepancy to chase. If Amazon loses units in a fulfillment center, bills you on the wrong dimensional weight, or refunds a customer for goods that never came back to sellable stock, A2X books what Amazon reported and moves on.
Inventory is the other boundary. COGS support exists and generally sits on higher tiers, but it is not a perpetual valuation system driven by landed cost. There is no purchase-order flow where a supplier invoice, a freight bill and duty all land against one shipment and roll into a per-unit cost that then drives COGS and the value of a reimbursement claim.
Neither gap is a flaw. Plenty of sellers run inventory in a separate system and want their accounting tool to stay in its lane. It only becomes a problem if you expected one tool to cover both jobs, because then you are buying two or three subscriptions and reconciling between them by hand every month.
Day to day, how the two actually differ
On A2X your month-end loop is short: settlements arrive, you review the mapping, you approve the journal in QuickBooks or Xero, done. COGS and inventory truth come from somewhere else, usually a spreadsheet or a separate inventory app, and reimbursements come from a third-party recovery service or from a VA working case logs by hand.
On BeanHawk the journal is the same shape, one summarized entry per settlement that reconciles to the deposit, but a discrepancy engine runs underneath the same data. Lost, damaged, over-charged-fee and returns-not-restocked cases surface continuously and get filed, and each claim is valued at your own landed cost rather than an estimate.
The practical difference is how many places your unit economics live. Three tools with three versions of what a unit costs, or one. If you have ever had a profit dashboard, a spreadsheet and a P&L disagree about the same SKU, you already know which side of that trade you are on.
Who should honestly pick A2X over BeanHawk
Pick A2X if settlement bookkeeping is the entire job and you want the option with the longest track record and the deepest accountant familiarity. If your CPA asked for it by name, that is worth more than any feature grid, including this one.
Pick A2X if you are single channel at moderate volume, your inventory is already handled somewhere you trust, and reimbursements are covered by a service you are happy with. Ripping out systems that work is real cost, and consolidation for its own sake is a bad reason to do it.
BeanHawk makes more sense when you are paying per channel across three or four marketplaces, when nobody is systematically chasing FBA discrepancies, or when your COGS figure is a spreadsheet that nobody fully believes. Price both against your real channel count and order volume before deciding.
What moving from A2X to BeanHawk involves
- 1
Export your account mapping before you cancel
Screenshot or export how A2X maps each settlement component (sales, refunds, shipping, each fee type, marketplace-facilitator tax) to your QuickBooks or Xero accounts. That mapping encodes decisions your accountant made, and recreating it is what keeps this year's numbers comparable to last year's.
- 2
Cut over on a period boundary
Switch on the first day of a month or quarter, never mid-period. Two tools posting into the same month produces a reconciliation nobody enjoys, and it is the single most common way a migration goes wrong.
- 3
Leave historical journals exactly where they are
Everything A2X already posted lives in QuickBooks or Xero and stays there. Nothing gets re-posted or migrated. BeanHawk starts at your cutover settlement and goes forward, so the ledger keeps one continuous history with no duplicate entries.
- 4
Parallel-run one settlement before you trust it
Let both tools process the same settlement and compare the journals line by line before you post ours. Totals should reconcile to the deposit to the penny. Any difference is almost always a mapping choice rather than a math error, and it is far cheaper to find on settlement one than at year end.
- 5
Expect to build landed cost from scratch
This part does not transfer, because A2X never held it. Perpetual valuation needs opening inventory quantities and unit costs entered once, after which POs carry freight and duty into per-unit cost automatically. Budget an afternoon for the opening balance, and note that reimbursement claim windows are governed by Amazon's own deadlines, so the sooner the recovery side is running the more of the back window is still open.
The honest verdict
A2X is a very good settlement accounting tool and the safe answer when that is the whole job, especially if an accountant you rely on already works in it. It is the wrong answer when you are paying for it three or four times because you sell on three or four channels, or when your books look tidy while the money Amazon owes you for lost and damaged units goes uncollected. BeanHawk is for the seller who wants journals of the same quality plus recovery and inventory valuation in one flat plan; A2X is for the seller whose other two jobs are already covered and who values the deepest accountant familiarity in the category. Run your own channel count and order volume against both tools' current published pricing before you decide, because that arithmetic usually settles it.
See what Amazon owes you — free
Connect your seller account and get a free reimbursement audit. No credit card, keep 100% of what you recover.
More comparisons: BeanHawk vs Link My Books · BeanHawk vs Sellerboard · BeanHawk vs Taxomate